Thread overview | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
April 16, 2008 JFace Port | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
As the swt port is being called dwt, I hope that the ongoing jface is or will be called dface.
--
JMNorris
|
April 16, 2008 Re: JFace Port | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to JMNorris | I think it's a good idea, DMNorris
JMNorris a écrit :
> As the swt port is being called dwt, I hope that the ongoing jface is or
> will be called dface.
>
|
April 16, 2008 Re: JFace Port | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to JMNorris | JMNorris Wrote:
> As the swt port is being called dwt, I hope that the ongoing jface is or will be called dface.
No, i have not plans to do this.
|
April 17, 2008 Re: JFace Port | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Frank Benoit | Frank Benoit wrote:
> JMNorris Wrote:
>
>> As the swt port is being called dwt, I hope that the ongoing jface is or
>> will be called dface.
>
> No, i have not plans to do this.
Let's pretend it stands for something else in the D version.
J is for...Jiffy.
JFace let's you create an interFace in a Jiffy. JFace.
It'll make you do a little Jiggy for Joy.
It might give you such a Jolly Jolt you'll want to Jot down all your code in D. Time for a Jelly sandwich now...
--bb
|
April 17, 2008 Re: JFace Port | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to JMNorris | On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:22:05 +0000, JMNorris wrote:
> As the swt port is being called dwt, I hope that the ongoing jface is or will be called dface.
Actually, it's a bit of a stretch calling DWT "DWT". It's really just a port of SWT, not a new thing. The name "DWT" has kind of stuck, though; so, among other things, it's here to stay.
JFace is another matter. Naming it "DFace" would have implications that just wouldn't be suitable for any respectable D port. :)
-JJR
|
April 17, 2008 Re: JFace Port | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to John Reimer | John Reimer <terminal.node@gmail.com> wrote in news:fu6flc$1c2m$1 @digitalmars.com: > On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:22:05 +0000, JMNorris wrote: > >> As the swt port is being called dwt, I hope that the ongoing jface is or will be called dface. > > > Actually, it's a bit of a stretch calling DWT "DWT". It's really just a port of SWT, not a new thing. The name "DWT" has kind of stuck, though; so, among other things, it's here to stay. > > JFace is another matter. Naming it "DFace" would have implications that just wouldn't be suitable for any respectable D port. :) Actually, I find it kinda cute--the D port with an attitude. :-) At any rate, it's probably better than DJFace: there's probably a reason the DJ is on radio rather than TV, and it's not his voice. -- JMNorris |
April 17, 2008 Re: JFace Port | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to JMNorris | JMNorris wrote:
> As the swt port is being called dwt, I hope that the ongoing jface is or
> will be called dface.
>
I like the name "dface", I think it's a very good name for the port.
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation