It didn't take very long after previous post to make a first implementation of signals and slots(thanks to great people from #d) which means that you can actually start doing something useful. 0.1 is probably most suitable tag for this release. Again - see tutorials for how to use signals.

Eldar Insafutdinov Wrote:

> It didn't take very long after previous post to make a first implementation of signals and slots(thanks to great people from #d) which means that you can actually start doing something useful. 0.1 is probably most suitable tag for this release. Again - see tutorials for how to use signals.

For those who don't know: http://code.google.com/p/qtd/

Great stuff!

Expect window's version!

I'm glad to see this release and the progress of qtd!

Coudl you please provide a link to the tutrial? Many thanks!

Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:

> It didn't take very long after previous post to make a first implementation of signals and slots(thanks to great people from #d) which means that you can actually start doing something useful. 0.1 is probably most suitable tag for this release. Again - see tutorials for how to use signals.

David Ferenczi Wrote:

> I'm glad to see this release and the progress of qtd!
> 
> Coudl you please provide a link to the tutrial? Many thanks!
> 
> Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
> 
> > It didn't take very long after previous post to make a first implementation of signals and slots(thanks to great people from #d) which means that you can actually start doing something useful. 0.1 is probably most suitable tag for this release. Again - see tutorials for how to use signals.
> 


tutorials are in trunk/examples http://code.google.com/p/qtd/source/browse/#svn/trunk/examples

ideage Wrote:

> Great stuff!
> 
> Expect window's version!
> 
> 
I will probably do it in couple of weeks. Don't have time now :(

Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
> It didn't take very long after previous post to make a first implementation of signals and slots(thanks to great people from #d) which means that you can actually start doing something useful. 0.1 is probably most suitable tag for this release. Again - see tutorials for how to use signals.

Very cool!  What versions of DMD/Tango are currently known to work with QtD?  (ie, what are you developing against.)  It'd be nifty to add a QtD profile to Sean Kerr's awesomely nifty sandboxing script.

-- Chris Nicholson-Sauls

Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
> David Ferenczi Wrote:
> 
>> I'm glad to see this release and the progress of qtd!
>>
>> Coudl you please provide a link to the tutrial? Many thanks!
>>
>> Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
>>
>>> It didn't take very long after previous post to make a first implementation of signals and slots(thanks to great people from #d) which means that you can actually start doing something useful. 0.1 is probably most suitable tag for this release. Again - see tutorials for how to use signals.
> 
> 
> tutorials are in trunk/examples http://code.google.com/p/qtd/source/browse/#svn/trunk/examples

"No files in this directory."

Well that sucks.  Oh well, I... hey, wait a second...

*unblocks javascript*

"No files in this directory, but there ARE subdirectories!"

Sometimes, I really wish there was a way to electrocute people for making their sites break without Javascript...

  -- Daniel

(Not angry at you, Eldar; angry at Google.  They should know better :) )

Daniel Keep escribió:
> 
> Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
>> David Ferenczi Wrote:
>>
>>> I'm glad to see this release and the progress of qtd!
>>>
>>> Coudl you please provide a link to the tutrial? Many thanks!
>>>
>>> Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
>>>
>>>> It didn't take very long after previous post to make a first
>>>> implementation of signals and slots(thanks to great people from #d) which
>>>> means that you can actually start doing something useful. 0.1 is probably
>>>> most suitable tag for this release. Again - see tutorials for how to use
>>>> signals.
>>
>> tutorials are in trunk/examples
>> http://code.google.com/p/qtd/source/browse/#svn/trunk/examples
> 
> "No files in this directory."
> 
> Well that sucks.  Oh well, I... hey, wait a second...
> 
> *unblocks javascript*
> 
> "No files in this directory, but there ARE subdirectories!"
> 
> Sometimes, I really wish there was a way to electrocute people for
> making their sites break without Javascript...

What? Why?

A web like that without Javascript is awfuly slow and ugly...

> 
>   -- Daniel
> 
> (Not angry at you, Eldar; angry at Google.  They should know better :) )

"Daniel Keep" <daniel.keep.lists@gmail.com> wrote in message news:gmfo1e$2ktp$1@digitalmars.com...
>
>
> Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
>> David Ferenczi Wrote:
>>
>>> I'm glad to see this release and the progress of qtd!
>>>
>>> Coudl you please provide a link to the tutrial? Many thanks!
>>>
>>> Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
>>>
>>>> It didn't take very long after previous post to make a first
>>>> implementation of signals and slots(thanks to great people from #d)
>>>> which
>>>> means that you can actually start doing something useful. 0.1 is
>>>> probably
>>>> most suitable tag for this release. Again - see tutorials for how to
>>>> use
>>>> signals.
>>
>>
>> tutorials are in trunk/examples http://code.google.com/p/qtd/source/browse/#svn/trunk/examples
>
> "No files in this directory."
>
> Well that sucks.  Oh well, I... hey, wait a second...
>
> *unblocks javascript*
>
> "No files in this directory, but there ARE subdirectories!"
>
> Sometimes, I really wish there was a way to electrocute people for making their sites break without Javascript...
>

I'd be first in line for that even if I had to camp out all week.

Plus, notice that you can't open one of the files in a new tab without it *also* opening in the same tab. That sort of garbage would never happen without JS.

As for concerns about a web without JS being too slow: JS-heavy sites ARE absurdly slow. I never had a problem with lag on *basic text entry* on a 386 or even an Apple 2. But with Firefox it happens constantly. Pathetic.