unittest => 1==1;
unittest math_still_works => 1==1;//generates ddoc

I see roughly 3 criticisms to my last suggestion

1. unittest without docs are bad
2. this is a bug; that should already work (???)
3. we may want agrumented unittests in the future

so handling the arguments out of order

2.

what? whatever i'll simplify the syntax

3.

by not using ()'s I assume it will leave open the door for whatever this theory is

1. docs

I dont care about this in the slightest but... whatever

unittest [name] => code;

if optional name exists generate a header and code in ddoc

name will replace'_'s with spaces, put it in a header followed by a code block of the code

so given this code

/**
* a very important function
*/

auto foo=>[1,2,3,4,5];
unittest foo_returns_an_array=>foo==[1,2,3,4,5];

will generate the docs

# foo
## int[] foo()

a very important function

## foo returns an array

```d
foo==[1,2,3,4,5];