unittest => 1==1;
unittest math_still_works => 1==1;//generates ddoc
I see roughly 3 criticisms to my last suggestion
- unittest without docs are bad
- this is a bug; that should already work (???)
- we may want agrumented unittests in the future
so handling the arguments out of order
2.
what? whatever i'll simplify the syntax
3.
by not using ()'s I assume it will leave open the door for whatever this theory is
1. docs
I dont care about this in the slightest but... whatever
unittest [name] => code;
if optional name
exists generate a header and code
in ddoc
name will replace'_'s with spaces, put it in a header followed by a code block of the code
so given this code
/**
* a very important function
*/
auto foo=>[1,2,3,4,5];
unittest foo_returns_an_array=>foo==[1,2,3,4,5];
will generate the docs
# foo
## int[] foo()
a very important function
## foo returns an array
```d
foo==[1,2,3,4,5];