It seems to me that dig hasn't been updated for
dmd 0.69.

In the digc files, strings are represented with ' ', which don't compile. r" " must be used since there er slashes there. There are also other problems with character literals like \n (which don't work with D, but they should methinks).

I looked at the errors in digc, but in the end, I didn't get it to compile.

Lars Ivar Igesund

In article <bia15t$28uf$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Lars Ivar Igesund says...
>
>I looked at the errors in digc, but in the end, I didn't get it to compile.


And that continues with DIDE not being able to compile the project. It can
compile a single .d file. Maybe I should try the full version?
Could someone make dig(c) available in binary form?


Metta,

Alen

Since Burton has been kinda lost lately, I modified my dig sources (0.0.12) so they could compile. You can download from http://dblinux.sis.epn.edu.ec/~csantand/dig.html (if the site suddenly isn't available or is too slow or whatever, it wouldn't be my fault). Hope it helps someone.

————————————————————————— Carlos Santander


---

Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date: 2003-08-19

"Carlos Santander B." <carlos8294@msn.com> wrote in message
news:bibkih$1iqf$1@digitaldaemon.com...
| Since Burton has been kinda lost lately, I modified my dig sources
(0.0.12)
| so they could compile. You can download from
| http://dblinux.sis.epn.edu.ec/~csantand/dig.html (if the site suddenly
isn't
| available or is too slow or whatever, it wouldn't be my fault). Hope it
| helps someone.
|

Just in case ppl in my uni decide to shut down the servers, you can go here: http://earth.prohosting.com/carlos3/dig.html. However, dig.zip won't download properly using tools like DAP and such (or so it seems), and/or using netscape. It works just fine with ie6 w/o downloading tools.

————————————————————————— Carlos Santander


---

Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date: 2003-08-19

I downloaded dig 0.14 and modified it to compile under dmd 0.70. Again, I've put available for other to use it. http://dblinux.sis.epn.edu.ec/~csantand/dig.html http://earth.prohosting.com/carlos3/dig.html

————————————————————————— Carlos Santander


---

Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date: 2003-08-20

Carlos Santander B. wrote:
> I downloaded dig 0.14 and modified it to compile under dmd 0.70. Again, I've
> put available for other to use it.
> http://dblinux.sis.epn.edu.ec/~csantand/dig.html
> http://earth.prohosting.com/carlos3/dig.html
> 
> —————————————————————————
> Carlos Santander
> 

Thanks for doing this, Carlos!  I downloaded your modified dig, and it did indeed fix the string literal problem.

There is one hangup, though.  For some reason the dig\makefile does not work as is in your zipfile.  For some reason your makefile is different than the original.  A simple change:

BASEDIR = c:\

to

BASEDIR = c:

... and everything compiled just fine.

Later,

John

All the DIG examples that were compiled now open a console window first when they are run (that stays open behind the program window).  Anybody know how I can get rid of these?  I don't recall this happening on earlier versions.

(dedit and cartoon examples specifically)

Later,

John

John Reimer wrote:

> All the DIG examples that were compiled now open a console window first when they are run (that stays open behind the program window).  Anybody know how I can get rid of these?  I don't recall this happening on earlier versions.
> 
> (dedit and cartoon examples specifically)
> 

Nevermind...

Found the -windowed option :-P

Hmm im still getting a problem

net\BurtonRadons\dig\windows\registry.d(79): undefined escape sequence \D

net\BurtonRadons\dig\windows\registry.d(79): semicolon expected, not
'SoftwareDD
ig'

Anyone else get this ?

Charles
"John Reimer" <jjreimer@telus.net> wrote in message
news:bikspr$m9t$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> Carlos Santander B. wrote:
> > I downloaded dig 0.14 and modified it to compile under dmd 0.70. Again,
I've
> > put available for other to use it. http://dblinux.sis.epn.edu.ec/~csantand/dig.html http://earth.prohosting.com/carlos3/dig.html
> >
> > ————————————————————————— Carlos Santander
> >
>
> Thanks for doing this, Carlos!  I downloaded your modified dig, and it did indeed fix the string literal problem.
>
> There is one hangup, though.  For some reason the dig\makefile does not work as is in your zipfile.  For some reason your makefile is different than the original.  A simple change:
>
> BASEDIR = c:\
>
> to
>
> BASEDIR = c:
>
> ... and everything compiled just fine.
>
> Later,
>
> John
>

Nevermind Im still using the old compiler, where is the new one ?!?


Charles

"Charles Sanders" <sanders-consulting@comcast.net> wrote in message news:bim3td$2m8f$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> Hmm im still getting a problem
>
> net\BurtonRadons\dig\windows\registry.d(79): undefined escape sequence \D
>
> net\BurtonRadons\dig\windows\registry.d(79): semicolon expected, not
> 'SoftwareDD
> ig'
>
> Anyone else get this ?
>
> Charles
> "John Reimer" <jjreimer@telus.net> wrote in message
> news:bikspr$m9t$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> > Carlos Santander B. wrote:
> > > I downloaded dig 0.14 and modified it to compile under dmd 0.70.
Again,
> I've
> > > put available for other to use it. http://dblinux.sis.epn.edu.ec/~csantand/dig.html http://earth.prohosting.com/carlos3/dig.html
> > >
> > > -------------------------
> > > Carlos Santander
> > >
> >
> > Thanks for doing this, Carlos!  I downloaded your modified dig, and it did indeed fix the string literal problem.
> >
> > There is one hangup, though.  For some reason the dig\makefile does not work as is in your zipfile.  For some reason your makefile is different than the original.  A simple change:
> >
> > BASEDIR = c:\
> >
> > to
> >
> > BASEDIR = c:
> >
> > ... and everything compiled just fine.
> >
> > Later,
> >
> > John
> >
>
>