Here's a first draft of an article on D's approaches to concurrency and parallelism for D's article contest.  It's not an official submission yet, but feedback would be appreciated.

http://davesdprogramming.wordpress.com/2011/04/07/7/

On 4/7/2011 7:01 PM, dsimcha wrote:
> Here's a first draft of an article on D's approaches to concurrency and
> parallelism for D's article contest. It's not an official submission
> yet, but feedback would be appreciated.
>
> http://davesdprogramming.wordpress.com/2011/04/07/7/

Made a few revisions, posted to Reddit.  Please vote.

http://www.reddit.com/r/reddit.com/comments/gmbkg/concurrency_parallelism_and_d/

dsimcha wrote:
> On 4/7/2011 7:01 PM, dsimcha wrote:
>> Here's a first draft of an article on D's approaches to concurrency and
>> parallelism for D's article contest. It's not an official submission
>> yet, but feedback would be appreciated.
>>
>> http://davesdprogramming.wordpress.com/2011/04/07/7/
>
> Made a few revisions, posted to Reddit. Please vote.
>
> http://www.reddit.com/r/reddit.com/comments/gmbkg/concurrency_parallelism_and_d/
>

Thank you for this article! It's very well explanation of threading issues and also it clearly shows that phobos multithreading support is wisely designed and comfortable to use.

Nice!

On 4/9/11 3:03 PM, dsimcha wrote:
> On 4/7/2011 7:01 PM, dsimcha wrote:
>> Here's a first draft of an article on D's approaches to concurrency and
>> parallelism for D's article contest. It's not an official submission
>> yet, but feedback would be appreciated.
>>
>> http://davesdprogramming.wordpress.com/2011/04/07/7/
>
> Made a few revisions, posted to Reddit. Please vote.
>
> http://www.reddit.com/r/reddit.com/comments/gmbkg/concurrency_parallelism_and_d/
>

Looks like your link was classified as spam. You may want to follow up with the moderators. A polite request has never been refused in my experience.

Andrei

On 4/9/11 5:04 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 4/9/11 3:03 PM, dsimcha wrote:
>> On 4/7/2011 7:01 PM, dsimcha wrote:
>>> Here's a first draft of an article on D's approaches to concurrency and
>>> parallelism for D's article contest. It's not an official submission
>>> yet, but feedback would be appreciated.
>>>
>>> http://davesdprogramming.wordpress.com/2011/04/07/7/
>>
>> Made a few revisions, posted to Reddit. Please vote.
>>
>> http://www.reddit.com/r/reddit.com/comments/gmbkg/concurrency_parallelism_and_d/
>>
>>
>
> Looks like your link was classified as spam. You may want to follow up
> with the moderators. A polite request has never been refused in my
> experience.
>
> Andrei

Reposted, now seems to have made it:

http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/gmdq3/concurrency_parallelism_and_the_d_programming/


Andrei

On 04/09/2011 03:03 PM, dsimcha wrote:
> On 4/7/2011 7:01 PM, dsimcha wrote:
>> Here's a first draft of an article on D's approaches to concurrency and
>> parallelism for D's article contest. It's not an official submission
>> yet, but feedback would be appreciated.
>>
>> http://davesdprogramming.wordpress.com/2011/04/07/7/
>
> Made a few revisions, posted to Reddit. Please vote.
>
> http://www.reddit.com/r/reddit.com/comments/gmbkg/concurrency_parallelism_and_d/

I think the article's title is missing a comma btw.

Andrei

2011/4/8 dsimcha <dsimcha@yahoo.com>:
> Here's a first draft of an article on D's approaches to concurrency and parallelism for D's article contest.  It's not an official submission yet, but feedback would be appreciated.
>
> http://davesdprogramming.wordpress.com/2011/04/07/7/
>

A very good article! And I like that you linked to other articles that go into more detail on  relevant subjects. I wouldn't mind a couple more examples.

Torarin

On 4/9/2011 7:56 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> I think the article's title is missing a comma btw.
>
> Andrei

Where?

On 04/09/2011 08:31 PM, dsimcha wrote:
> On 4/9/2011 7:56 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> I think the article's title is missing a comma btw.
>>
>> Andrei
>
> Where?

Where could it ever be? After "parallelism".

Andrei

On 4/9/2011 10:22 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 04/09/2011 08:31 PM, dsimcha wrote:
>> On 4/9/2011 7:56 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>> I think the article's title is missing a comma btw.
>>>
>>> Andrei
>>
>> Where?
>
> Where could it ever be? After "parallelism".
>
> Andrei

Actually, I specifically remember learning about this grammar rule in middle school.  When listing stuff, the comma before the "and" is optional.  Putting it and not putting it are both correct.