dmd commit, revision 558


user: walter

msg:
64

http://www.dsource.org/projects/dmd/changeset/558

I saw this commit adds some XMM0..XMM7 code.
What about XMM8..XMM15?
AMD introduced these 8 additional registers with their SSE2 implementation
in 2003 and Intel adopted it with Intel64 in 2004 already.

568	 	#define REGMAX  17      // registers are numbered 0..10
 	568	#define REGMAX  29      // registers are numbered 0..10


It looks like this comment has been out of date for several revisions... Time to delete it?

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 24, 2010, at 4:52 PM, "dsource.org" <noreply at dsource.org> wrote:

> dmd commit, revision 558
> 
> 
> user: walter
> 
> msg:
> 64
> 
> http://www.dsource.org/projects/dmd/changeset/558
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-internals mailing list
> dmd-internals at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/dmd-internals/attachments/20100624/2a27864a/attachment.html>

Trass3r wrote:
> I saw this commit adds some XMM0..XMM7 code.
> What about XMM8..XMM15?
> AMD introduced these 8 additional registers with their SSE2
> implementation in 2003 and Intel adopted it with Intel64 in 2004 already.
>

They won't fit in the 32 bit mask. I haven't decided how to deal with it yet.

> They won't fit in the 32 bit mask. I haven't decided how to deal with it yet.

Ah I see.