Jump to page: 1 2
Thread overview
Can we make a game in D within 4 hours?
Jan 31, 2004
yaneurao
Feb 01, 2004
Manfred Nowak
F*UCK WiN98
Feb 02, 2004
davepermen
Re: F*&% WiN98
Feb 02, 2004
J C Calvarese
Feb 02, 2004
davepermen
Feb 02, 2004
yaneurao
Feb 02, 2004
Manfred Nowak
Feb 02, 2004
yaneurao
Re: Phobos group , was: Can we make a game in D within 4 hours?
Feb 02, 2004
C
Feb 02, 2004
imr1984
Re: Phobos group
Feb 02, 2004
Lars Ivar Igesund
Feb 07, 2004
Walter
Feb 07, 2004
Ant
Feb 07, 2004
Walter
Feb 09, 2004
Ant
Feb 09, 2004
yaneurao
Feb 09, 2004
Ant
Feb 09, 2004
C
January 31, 2004
I tryed to make a game programming in D within 4 hours.

my result is this game:
http://yaneurao.zive.net/yaneSDK4D/sample7.zip
(move the heart by cursor key,and elude from musical notes)

my game replay data is here:
http://yaneurao.zive.net/yaneSDK4D/sample7b.zip
(extract and overwrite to sample7 extracting folder , and run replay4.bat)

can somebody overcome the high score?
or
will somebody challenge to make a game programming in D within 4 hours?

it's very thrilling experience.

yaneurao.


February 01, 2004
yaneurao wrote:

[...]
> it's very thrilling experience.

Seems to have an error, WIN98SE error message (german):

| SAMPLE7 verursachte einen Fehler durch eine ungültige Seite in | Modul SAMPLE7.EXE bei 0167:00425218.

I.e. invalid page.

So long.
February 02, 2004
if there is one depressing thing that D showed up, then it's how much outdated software is still in use..

why the **** do people still have to use win98..

not to say i'm not affected myself. we run win98 at a lot of pc's at work, myself, too..

it's just so depressing.

"Manfred Nowak" <svv1999@hotmail.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:bvk27m$1di9$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> yaneurao wrote:
>
> [...]
> > it's very thrilling experience.
>
> Seems to have an error, WIN98SE error message (german):
>
> | SAMPLE7 verursachte einen Fehler durch eine ungültige Seite in | Modul SAMPLE7.EXE bei 0167:00425218.
>
> I.e. invalid page.
>
> So long.


February 02, 2004
In article <bvk27m$1di9$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Manfred Nowak says...
>| SAMPLE7 verursachte einen Fehler durch eine ungültige Seite in
>| Modul SAMPLE7.EXE bei 0167:00425218.
>I.e. invalid page.

the cause is the DMD compiler's bug I've reported again and again.

cf.
http://www.digitalmars.com/drn-bin/wwwnews?D/22430

yaneurao.


February 02, 2004
davepermen wrote:
> if there is one depressing thing that D showed up, then it's how much
> outdated software is still in use..
> 
> why the **** do people still have to use win98..
I'm sure different people have different reasons.

I put off buying the WinXP upgrade for a long time in an effort to avoid giving Microsoft money. They are not afraid to release buggy or limited software because they know they can cash in by selling the next big thing.

I don't have any plans on upgrading Windows again. When WinXP is completely obsolete, I plan to go 100% Linux.

> 
> not to say i'm not affected myself. we run win98 at a lot of pc's at work,
> myself, too..
> 
> it's just so depressing.

I find it depressing that it takes so much effort to get software to run on the various version of 32-bit Windows.

-- 
Justin
http://jcc_7.tripod.com/d/
February 02, 2004
any non-NT based technology is known to not be really compatible to NT based one. winNT,2000,XP are known to be rather.. logical designed. en contraire win98 and previous ones, wich simply suck.

but i know there are reasons to stay. as i said, we use win98 at work ourselfes.. but the reasons are often depressing. if you use microsoft products, use win2000/XP/2003. nothing else. if you don't, well, you will not use win98 anyways:D

tons of issues here are sort of problems based on the wrong os. i call win98 a wrong os, because it's just plain stupid. it's a legacy app. i don't see any need why new stuff has to be that far backward compatible. it would be nice, yes. but microsoft wants it's own biggest fault finally to die out. one step is, to simply not work for it anymore..

"J C Calvarese" <jcc7@cox.net> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:bvkm2u$2cs8$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> davepermen wrote:
> > if there is one depressing thing that D showed up, then it's how much outdated software is still in use..
> >
> > why the **** do people still have to use win98..
> I'm sure different people have different reasons.
>
> I put off buying the WinXP upgrade for a long time in an effort to avoid giving Microsoft money. They are not afraid to release buggy or limited software because they know they can cash in by selling the next big thing.
>
> I don't have any plans on upgrading Windows again. When WinXP is completely obsolete, I plan to go 100% Linux.
>
> >
> > not to say i'm not affected myself. we run win98 at a lot of pc's at
work,
> > myself, too..
> >
> > it's just so depressing.
>
> I find it depressing that it takes so much effort to get software to run on the various version of 32-bit Windows.
>
> -- 
> Justin
> http://jcc_7.tripod.com/d/


February 02, 2004
yaneurao wrote:

> the cause is the DMD compiler's bug I've reported again and again.
[...]

So? Why don't you have your phobos rebuilt? Mine is.

So long.
February 02, 2004
In article <bvldjp$isr$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Manfred Nowak says...
>> the cause is the DMD compiler's bug I've reported again and again.
>[...]
>So? Why don't you have your phobos rebuilt? Mine is.

I know phobos has many bugs.
so I don't want to fix phobos every time DMD version up.

yaneurao.


February 02, 2004
Agreed.

Walter , if we setup a phobos group , can you approve it.  We could keep a list of changes made and you can accept / reject the changes as you see fit.

We really need this , D is getting pretty popular, and the phobos library is showing its age.

"yaneurao" <yaneurao_member@pathlink.com> wrote in message news:bvlffi$mnn$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> In article <bvldjp$isr$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Manfred Nowak says...
> >> the cause is the DMD compiler's bug I've reported again and again.
> >[...]
> >So? Why don't you have your phobos rebuilt? Mine is.
>
> I know phobos has many bugs.
> so I don't want to fix phobos every time DMD version up.
>
> yaneurao.
>
>


February 02, 2004
so true

In article <bvm5g3$1rm0$1@digitaldaemon.com>, C says...
>
>Agreed.
>
>Walter , if we setup a phobos group , can you approve it.  We could keep a list of changes made and you can accept / reject the changes as you see fit.
>
>We really need this , D is getting pretty popular, and the phobos library is showing its age.
>
>"yaneurao" <yaneurao_member@pathlink.com> wrote in message news:bvlffi$mnn$1@digitaldaemon.com...
>> In article <bvldjp$isr$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Manfred Nowak says...
>> >> the cause is the DMD compiler's bug I've reported again and again.
>> >[...]
>> >So? Why don't you have your phobos rebuilt? Mine is.
>>
>> I know phobos has many bugs.
>> so I don't want to fix phobos every time DMD version up.
>>
>> yaneurao.
>>
>>
>
>


« First   ‹ Prev
1 2