After brief discussion with Brian and gathering data from the review thread, I have decided to start voting for `std.d.lexer` inclusion into Phobos.

-----------------------------------------------------

All relevant information can be found here: http://wiki.dlang.org/Review/std.d.lexer (it includes link to post-review change set and some clarifications by Brian)

Review thread is here: http://forum.dlang.org/post/jsnhlcbulwyjuqcqoepe@forum.dlang.org

-----------------------------------------------------

Instructions for voters

> The goal of the vote is to allow the Review Manager to decided if the
> community agrees on the inclusion of the submission.
> 
>    Place further discussion of the library in the official review thread.
>        If replying to an opinion stated during a vote, copy all relevant
>        context and post in the official review thread.
> 
>    If you would like to see the proposed module included into Phobos
>        Vote Yes
>    If one condition must be met
>        Vote Yes explicitly stating it is under a condition and what condition.
>        You may specify an improvement you'd like to see, but be sure to state
>        it is not a condition/showstopper.
>    Otherwise
>        Vote No
>        A brief reason should be provided though details on what needs
>        improvement should be placed in the official review thread.

(c) wiki.dlang.org/Review/Process

-----------------------------------------------------

If you need to ask any last moment questions before making your decision, please do it in last review thread (linked in beginning of this post).

Voting will last until the next weekend (Oct 12 23:59 GMT +0)

Thanks for your attention.

Yes!

On 2013-10-02 16:41, Dicebot wrote:
> After brief discussion with Brian and gathering data from the review
> thread, I have decided to start voting for `std.d.lexer` inclusion into
> Phobos.

Yes.

Not a condition but I would prefer the default exception being thrown not to be Exception but a subclass.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg

On Wednesday, 2 October 2013 at 14:41:56 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> After brief discussion with Brian and gathering data from the review thread, I have decided to start voting for `std.d.lexer` inclusion into Phobos.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> All relevant information can be found here: http://wiki.dlang.org/Review/std.d.lexer (it includes link to post-review change set and some clarifications by Brian)
>
> Review thread is here: http://forum.dlang.org/post/jsnhlcbulwyjuqcqoepe@forum.dlang.org
>
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Instructions for voters
>
>> The goal of the vote is to allow the Review Manager to decided if the
>> community agrees on the inclusion of the submission.
>> 
>>   Place further discussion of the library in the official review thread.
>>       If replying to an opinion stated during a vote, copy all relevant
>>       context and post in the official review thread.
>> 
>>   If you would like to see the proposed module included into Phobos
>>       Vote Yes
>>   If one condition must be met
>>       Vote Yes explicitly stating it is under a condition and what condition.
>>       You may specify an improvement you'd like to see, but be sure to state
>>       it is not a condition/showstopper.
>>   Otherwise
>>       Vote No
>>       A brief reason should be provided though details on what needs
>>       improvement should be placed in the official review thread.
>
> (c) wiki.dlang.org/Review/Process
>
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> If you need to ask any last moment questions before making your decision, please do it in last review thread (linked in beginning of this post).
>
> Voting will last until the next weekend (Oct 12 23:59 GMT +0)
>
> Thanks for your attention.

Yes! :)

Yes.

I see this effort driving great advances in D's tooling ecosystem.

On Wednesday, 2 October 2013 at 14:41:56 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> After brief discussion with Brian and gathering data from the review thread, I have decided to start voting for `std.d.lexer` inclusion into Phobos.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> All relevant information can be found here: http://wiki.dlang.org/Review/std.d.lexer (it includes link to post-review change set and some clarifications by Brian)
>
> Review thread is here: http://forum.dlang.org/post/jsnhlcbulwyjuqcqoepe@forum.dlang.org
>
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Instructions for voters
>
>> The goal of the vote is to allow the Review Manager to decided if the
>> community agrees on the inclusion of the submission.
>> 
>>   Place further discussion of the library in the official review thread.
>>       If replying to an opinion stated during a vote, copy all relevant
>>       context and post in the official review thread.
>> 
>>   If you would like to see the proposed module included into Phobos
>>       Vote Yes
>>   If one condition must be met
>>       Vote Yes explicitly stating it is under a condition and what condition.
>>       You may specify an improvement you'd like to see, but be sure to state
>>       it is not a condition/showstopper.
>>   Otherwise
>>       Vote No
>>       A brief reason should be provided though details on what needs
>>       improvement should be placed in the official review thread.
>
> (c) wiki.dlang.org/Review/Process
>
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> If you need to ask any last moment questions before making your decision, please do it in last review thread (linked in beginning of this post).
>
> Voting will last until the next weekend (Oct 12 23:59 GMT +0)
>
> Thanks for your attention.

Yes :)

Yes!

On Wednesday, 2 October 2013 at 14:41:56 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> After brief discussion with Brian and gathering data from the review thread, I have decided to start voting for `std.d.lexer` inclusion into Phobos.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> All relevant information can be found here: http://wiki.dlang.org/Review/std.d.lexer (it includes link to post-review change set and some clarifications by Brian)
>
> Review thread is here: http://forum.dlang.org/post/jsnhlcbulwyjuqcqoepe@forum.dlang.org
>
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Instructions for voters
>
>> The goal of the vote is to allow the Review Manager to decided if the
>> community agrees on the inclusion of the submission.
>> 
>>   Place further discussion of the library in the official review thread.
>>       If replying to an opinion stated during a vote, copy all relevant
>>       context and post in the official review thread.
>> 
>>   If you would like to see the proposed module included into Phobos
>>       Vote Yes
>>   If one condition must be met
>>       Vote Yes explicitly stating it is under a condition and what condition.
>>       You may specify an improvement you'd like to see, but be sure to state
>>       it is not a condition/showstopper.
>>   Otherwise
>>       Vote No
>>       A brief reason should be provided though details on what needs
>>       improvement should be placed in the official review thread.
>
> (c) wiki.dlang.org/Review/Process
>
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> If you need to ask any last moment questions before making your decision, please do it in last review thread (linked in beginning of this post).
>
> Voting will last until the next weekend (Oct 12 23:59 GMT +0)
>
> Thanks for your attention.

Yes.

Yes

Yes.

( I have not found any rules that prohibit review manager from voting :) )